Talk:City Sushi

Animation: American / Television / Computer / South Park Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Animated television work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Computer animation work group.
	This article is supported by the South Park task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force (assessed as Low-importance).

United States: Animation / Television / Colorado Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Animation portal This article is supported by WikiProject Animation - American animation work group.
	Television portal This article is supported by American television task force.
	Colorado portal This article is supported by WikiProject Colorado, our collaboration to create, improve, and update Wikipedia articles about the U.S. State of Colorado. To comment about this article, select the Add topic tab above. For questions about, or to make suggestions for Colorado articles, go to our project's talk page. We invite you to join us!

Notability

Latest comment: 13 years ago7 comments3 people in discussion

We don't really need a page for every episode of every series ever aired on any TV channel. The article was PRODded and subsequently de-PRODded with the rationale "rm PROD. AFD it if you want it gone. All the episodes have pages. This one will take additional referencing in the coming days, seeing as it only just aired last night". This is a curious argument. The fact that the other episodes have pages is irrelevant. The fact that there are no independent reliable sources is relevant. Lack of sources means a lack of notability. Creating an article on the expectation that sources will become available is against WP:NOTCRYSTAL. In addition, if sources are not available, that means that the article as it currently stands is completely based on original research. I appreciate that most people frantically editing this page are rather new editors, but you all should really get acquainted with Wikipedia's content and sourcing policies. If substantial sources cannot be found within the next few days, I will indeed take this article to AfD and do not doubt that it will be deleted (of course, everything changes if real sources can be added and the article based on that, instead of opinions of people who saw this yesterday). --Crusio (talk) 17:41, 2 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

"We don't need a page for every episode of every series ever aired on any TV channel" was the subject of a truckload of ArbCom drama a few years back. Every South Park episode is reviewed by several notable webzines, the person who created this article before it aired was doing so based on a common sense assumption. In 2 minutes I found [1], [2], [3], [4] sources. I'll add a reviews section later on this evening once I finish work.. - filelake shoe 18:23, 2 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

read this to make sure you're not going round in circles regarding episodes' notability - filelake shoe 18:24, 2 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, I'll do that. --Crusio (talk) 18:41, 2 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

OK, I had a look and also at WP:Episode. Nowhere does it say: assume there will be sources and make something up yourself while waiting for them to become available. Common sense may tell us that sources will become available. WP policies tell us to wait writing an article until they actually are available. Articles should be based on those sources. People should not first write a load of WP:OR, that others than later tag some sources on, so that it seems that the stuff is actually properly sourced. Just my 2 cents. I'll take this of my watchlist, I have better things to do in more serious parts of the project. --Crusio (talk) 18:48, 2 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Notability is not inherited, the cultural references is all WP:OR for now, the plot requires no reference, the source is the episode itself. Not sure why this article should adhere to film notability guidelines (probably just the closest specific guideline to television), but at this point it does fail the general notability guidelines. On the PROD removal; anyone can remove the PROD tags as they see fit, even without giving a reason, or a dubious one. _Xeworlebi ^(talk) 20:11, 2 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

I indeed cited the film guideline as it seemed to come closest. Actually, WP:Episode applies (and it fails that one, too). --Crusio (talk) 20:45, 2 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on City Sushi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110607025351/http://m.ign.com/articles/1172164 to http://m.ign.com/articles/1172164

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:07, 8 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic