Talk:City of Brighton
Latest comment: 5 years ago by StraussInTheHouse in topic Requested move 28 October 2019
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the City of Brighton page. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Requested move 28 October 2019
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Consensus to move. (closed by non-admin page mover) SITH (talk) 14:37, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
– No clear primary topic. The SA one gets 37 views compared to this one's 104, Brighton and Hove (which is prefixed with "City of") gets 7,891 views and there are at least 4 other cities who's administrative divisions are called "City of Brighton"[1][2][3][4]. When I search for City of Brighton on Google I only get results for the English ones but that's probably because of my location. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:25, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
- Support. The small Australian city is certainly not primary. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:04, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
- Support. I agree that there's no primary topic. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 19:27, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.