Talk:City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality

Untitled

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was MOVED PER REQUEST -GTBacchus^(talk) 04:56, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Requested move

Government of Johannesburg → City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality – This article name does not conform to the standard of the other Metropolitan Municipalities in South Africa. The government of Johannesburg is actually called the City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality Park3r 18:13, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Survey

Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~

• Support as per nomination. Park3r 08:33, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Discussion

Add any additional comments

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

MLCs

After the mid -1990's there were MLCs established (Metropolitan Local Councils) as a transitional measure, before the Metropolitan Municipality was created. Is there more information on these? I have found a list here: [1] Park3r (talk) 22:27, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090105212134/http://www.liasa.org.za/conferences/conference2004/papers/LIASA_Conference_2004_Digoamaje.pdf to http://www.liasa.org.za/conferences/conference2004/papers/LIASA_Conference_2004_Digoamaje.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060923211142/http://www.joburg.org.za/2006/may/may11_structure.stm to http://www.joburg.org.za/2006/may/may11_structure.stm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:06, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

2016 Municipal election results

When the 2016 Municipal election results are incorporated into the article, I would like to suggest that the 2011 results are retained and not written over. Wayne Jayes (talk) 14:13, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100714013749/http://www.gcis.gov.za:80/gcis/gcis_list.jsp?id=14&heading=Executive%20Mayors to http://www.gcis.gov.za/gcis/gcis_list.jsp?id=14&heading=Executive%20Mayors

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:38, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.gcis.gov.za/gcis/gcis_list.jsp?id=14&heading=Executive%20Mayors
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.capsa-events.co.za/capsa04/Documents/064.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051104010128/http://www.joburg.org.za/unicity/structure.stm to http://www.joburg.org.za/unicity/structure.stm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:58, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Proposed merge with Regions of Johannesburg

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Merge.

---

Regions of Johannesburg is innately a sub-page of City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality, and the separation has introduced duplication and greatly reduced comprehensibility. Batternut (talk) 18:02, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

• support merger (as proposer) - clarity and maintainability will both be improved. The Regions of ... article is very unlikely to ever become a good read. Batternut (talk) 18:08, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Municipality or City?

Hi. We have a paragraph in the article which says:

Johannesburg is a divided city: the poor mostly live in the southern suburbs or on the peripheries of the far north, and the middle- and upper class live largely in the suburbs of the central and north. As of 2012, unemployment is near 25% and most young people are out of work. Around 20% of the city lives in abject poverty in informal settlements that lack proper roads, electricity, or any other kind of direct municipal service.

So, here, in places where we have used the word "city", aren't we supposed to be using the word "municipality"? What I mean is, how can we tell people that Orange Farm and Midrand are in the same city?

When we say "peripheries of the far north", we are talking about Diepsloot and Ivory Park, right? Even just these two are not in the same city!

So, the City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality has got many settlements within it such as Sandton, Roodepoort, Orange Farm, Midrand, Lenasia and others. It doesn't seem right for us on Wikipedia to treat all these settlements as "one city". That's like saying Nigel and Thembisa are in the same city just because they are in the same municipality and we all know they are not in the same city.

So, I insist that we must change the way we use the word "city" in this article. Thanks. GeographicAccountant (talk) 22:23, 21 September 2024 (UTC)