Talk:City of Los Angeles (train)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was move per request. It's almost shocking that these have persisted for any time. I would bet 95% of the hits these articles get are from misdirected people looking for the cities.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:50, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

---

• City of Los Angeles → City of Los Angeles (train)
• City of San Francisco → City of San Francisco (train)
• City of Denver → City of Denver (train)
• City of Portland → City of Portland (train)
• City of St. Louis → City of St. Louis (train)
• City of Las Vegas → City of Las Vegas (train)

– Most people usually don't think of trains when they hear of the "City of Los Angeles." [1] Marcus Qwertyus 05:38, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

Support redirecting undabbed and renaming trains as dabs.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 18:02, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

• Strong support they should obviously redirect to their respective cities. -- 76.65.131.160 (talk) 07:51, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
• I've dropped a note at WP:TWP so we can get some more participation. Mackensen (talk) 11:59, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
• Move all per nom; then the redirects left behind should each be amended - they should point at the dab page if there is one (e.g. Saint Louis), or if not, at the article about the settlement. --Redrose64 (talk) 16:31, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
• Support all - I agree that these article should be renamed as requested. I would request that the original title be made into a disambig page, (or redirected to an existing one as an option - ie Saint Louis as per Redrose64), with the actual "city" in question as the primary topic.--MrBoire (talk) 18:44, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
• Support, pretty straight forward Primary topic.--Education does not equal common sense. 我不在乎 15:35, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
• Strong support per nom. - These names are for the trains, not the cities they were destined for. ----DanTD (talk) 03:34, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on City of Los Angeles (train). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060617232613/http://www.trains.com/Content/Dynamic/Articles/000/000/001/138fddcg.asp to http://www.trains.com/Content/Dynamic/Articles/000/000/001/138fddcg.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:07, 8 August 2017 (UTC)