Talk:City of Norwood v. Horney

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ohio portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ohio.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

I am thinking about editing this article to reflect the procedural posture, the issue before the court, exactly what the two sides were arguing, and the grounds on which the Ohio Supreme Court found for the homeowners. I think that because this was the first case involving a state supreme court's interpretation of the 'public use' clause and whether eminent domain can be used for private development after the US Supreme Court Kelo case, this information should be included in the article. Any thoughts? Lawiggin 12:55, 7 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Definitely- the fact that this was the first post-Kelo ruling is its strongest argument for notability. 4.229.219.206 04:38, 16 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Note: The links to the cases are not working. Not sure if you can still link directly to a case.Memargolis (talk) 18:26, 24 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on City of Norwood v. Horney. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:14, 8 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic