Talk:City region (United Kingdom)

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Dan100 in topic Leeds

Edinburgh

edit

If this article is about ENGLISH as oppopsed to UK politcs why does Edinburgh in Scotland get a mention?— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.30.232.17 (talk) 08:58, 29 February 2012

Rewrite

edit

This article needs to be rewritten from scratch. The original version was OK apart from an absence of reliable sources, but since then there have been various inaccuracies added, as well as the ridiculous drive-by over-tagging. It's an embarrassment. It's an area in which I have some professional expertise (which I had hoped would be well behind me now, but oh well...), so will endeavour to rewrite it at some point when time allows - not to a formidably high standard, but to a standard that will do. Thoughts welcome. Ghmyrtle (talk) 15:45, 11 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

PS: Ten months later... yet another failed resolution. D'oh.... Ghmyrtle (talk) 12:40, 28 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

The current external link is to something in Lorem Ipsum - [1] may be a more suitable link. Jackiespeel (talk) 18:41, 18 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on City region (United Kingdom). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:30, 25 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on City region (United Kingdom). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:44, 8 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Leeds

edit

what happened to Leeds City Region ? Also please note that Barnsley is shared with Sheffield City Region. I think it is because people residing in Barnsley commute to both Sheffield & Leeds for work. J mareeswaran (talk) 16:02, 23 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Yep this article and the combined authority one is a shambles 🤦 Dan100 (Talk) 10:03, 14 October 2020 (UTC)Reply