Talk:Civil confinement

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Klbrain in topic Merger proposal

Merger proposal

edit

These two articles are covering the same thing and I suggest they be merged. deisenbe (talk) 11:14, 19 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Deisenbe, and which article title do you suggest we use? Keep WP:Common name in mind. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 23:10, 20 October 2017 (UTC)Reply
Since you reverted my renaming the one article I have nothing further to contribute at this time. deisenbe (talk) 13:07, 23 October 2017 (UTC)Reply
I gave valid reasoning for reverting your move of that article. And that move should have no bearing on this merge discussion, but we both know how upset you get when I revert you and give you valid reasoning for reverting you. Your merge tag can remain for years. Instead, I will see about removing it after two months. Of course, you could simply start a WP:RfC on whether or not the articles should be merged or a WP:Requested moves discussion. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 21:59, 25 October 2017 (UTC)Reply
Support merge with Sexually violent predator laws, suggesting that Civil confinement would be the better target. Both articles cover the same topic, and there is only one outcome: that of civil confinement. The laws leading to that outcome could really be covered under that heading. Klbrain (talk) 00:22, 7 January 2019 (UTC)Reply