Talk:Clare Winger Harris/GA1

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Starting GA reassessment as part of the GA Sweeps process. Jezhotwells (talk) 08:56, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose):

   b (MoS):

   • The Lead should be a concise summary of the entire article. Currently it fails on this as it should summarize the Life and Critical view and influence sections. I made some re-organization and removed one duplicate links section. Jezhotwells (talk) 10:02, 3 August 2009 (UTC) Y

     I expanded the lead somewhat; the first lead para uses citations but this is not required so I have not done so in the new lead para. Mike Christie (talk) 10:21, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references):

   • I have fixed a number of dead links, but one remains, marked in the text [1]. I have reformatted cites, de-duped them and separated cites in instances where two had been crammed into one reference. Jezhotwells (talk) 10:02, 3 August 2009 (UTC) Y

     Fixed. Mike Christie (talk) 10:21, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

   b (citations to reliable sources):

   • OK

   c (OR):

3. It is broad in its scope.

   a (major aspects):

   b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):

   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   • Basically it is down to one dead link and some expansion of the lead - on hold for seven days. Projects and major contributors will be informed. Jezhotwells (talk) 10:02, 3 August 2009 (UTC) Y
   • Thanks for your hard work. I am happy to confirm the class of this article as GA. Jezhotwells (talk) 07:58, 5 August 2009 (UTC)