Talk:Claude Fredericks
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright problem removed
editPrior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://hdl.handle.net/10020/cifa900230c. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 20:27, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
License Added to Copyrighted Source
editGreetings. I'm the person who added the biographical material that you have deleted. The material deleted was NOT derived from the source you cite above, http://hdl.handle.net/10020/cifa900230c. That link is a finding aid to the Fredericks archive at the Getty, and contains minimal biographical information.
The content which you removed was derived from a Facebook post by The Claude Fredericks Foundation, located at https://www.facebook.com/644527685564714/photos/a.644542378896578.1073741828.644527685564714/646172662066883/?type=1. I in fact had permission from the Foundation to post this material, but as you correctly pointed out the Foundation had not formally authorized reuse. At my request, the Foundation has added "[ Reuse is permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0. ]" to the post.
I trust that this resolves the copyright concerns relating to this text. Would you please confirm this? Mergy (talk) 21:21, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Copyedited
edit | Guild of Copy Editors | |||
| ||||