Talk:Claude Thomas Stanfield Moore

Tom/Thomas

Although the following is from primary records it appear he was born Tom and changed his name at some point to use Claude, non of these sources use Thomas:

• 1853 index of births for June 1853 quarter "Tom Claude Stanfield Moore, Nottingham, 7b 228".
• 1861 Census of Nottingham "Tom Claude S Moore, son, unmarried, male, aged 7, born Nottingham.
• 1871 Census of Nottignham "Tom Claude Stanfield Moore, son, unmarried, male, aged 17, Apprentice Lithographer, born Nottingham"
• 1881 Census of Nottingham "Claude T S Moore, son, single, male, aged 27, artist, born Nottingham"
• 1891 Census of Nottingham "Tom C S Moore, son, single, male, aged 37, artist marine, born Nottingham".
• 1901 index of deaths for June 1901 quarter "Claude Tom S Moore, age 47, Nottingham, 7b 195". All counts for original research but here for the record. MilborneOne (talk) 16:49, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

Revision of 29th April 2012

The article has been rearranged to incorporate evidence resulting from further research, with care to preserve the original material, although some references have been changed, where more appropriate ones have been found. The scope of the article has been widened to include a little more about Claude's father and brother, who were also both artists, whilst keeping Claude Thomas Stanfield Moore as the focal point of the article. I also noticed the re-ordering of Claude's given names and the abbreviation to Tom; it is unfortunate that he has two initials in common with his father but signatures, from his material, which I have on record, are quite distinctive, see signature comparisons, while link is open. The Edit Summary box was completed, after editing the article but my summary has not appeared anywhare; I expected it to appear in the Page History. What have I done wrong? Please be kind, I am only a novice Wickipedian. Brianheason (talk) 10:52, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Claude Thomas Stanfield Moore. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120222170100/http://www.rotherham.gov.uk/info/200070/museums_and_galleries/26/art_gallery/1 to http://www.rotherham.gov.uk/info/200070/museums_and_galleries/26/art_gallery/1
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.livebetter.co.uk/TheMoores/the_moores_000002.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120717041118/http://www.livebetter.co.uk/TheMoores/index.htm to http://www.livebetter.co.uk/TheMoores/index.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:13, 9 August 2017 (UTC)