Talk:Clevedon Hall

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 11 November 2015 by reviewer Timtrent (talk · contribs).

Architecture

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Somerset Low‑importance

	Somerset portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Somerset, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Somerset on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SomersetWikipedia:WikiProject SomersetTemplate:WikiProject SomersetSomerset articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Jojourneypr (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.

Possible paid editing

Latest comment: 9 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

It is possible that User:Jojourneypr who started this article may have been paid by the Journey agency to create it. Care is therefore needed to ensure it provides a neutral point of view.— Rod ^talk 10:34, 16 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Rodw: I asked this editor on their talk page about this. There has been no reply s far. I have moved the CC banner up into the head section and fleshed it out slightly. I wonder, though. Since we have the CC banner up there ^^^^^, do we require the COI banner on the article page itself. I have no strong feelings either way. Fiddle Faddle 11:23, 16 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

I'm not sure of the best way to handle this - casual readers may not visit the talk page and therefore might not be aware. I have asked for advice/expert eyes at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard#Clevedon Hall.— Rod ^talk 11:33, 16 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

As the promotional material has been removed by User:Nagle with this edit would people be happy for the COI banner to be removed from the article? I would leave it here on the talk page.— Rod ^talk 20:22, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

As there had not been any responses I have removed the banner. Happy to discuss if anyone thinks this is still needed.— Rod ^talk 18:53, 1 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Clevedon Hall. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:21, 9 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic