Talk:Cleveland Centennial half dollar/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Maile66 (talk · contribs) 21:50, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:

   Earwig's Copyvio Detector says 0 % violations unlikely. Congratulations on the clean editing.

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. Has an appropriate reference section:

   B. Cites reliable sources, where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused (see summary style):

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

   Nominator created the article August 10, 2014, has been the primary editor, with less than half a dozen minor edits by others since that date.

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   • 1936 50C Cleveland.jpg (Portrait of Moses Cleaveland image of the coin) - Public Domain
   • General Moses Cleaveland.jpg - Public Domain
   • 1936 50C Cincinnati.jpg (Cincinnati Musical Center half dollar) - Public Domain

   B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

   Captions provided

   Need WP:ALT, per WP:CAP

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   The only thing missing is the ALT text in the images. Everything else looks great. — Maile (talk) 14:41, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

   @Wehwalt: has added the ALT text. This nomination passes. — Maile (talk) 21:47, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.