Talk:Client honeypot

Computer Security: Computing Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer Security, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer security on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer SecurityWikipedia:WikiProject Computer SecurityTemplate:WikiProject Computer SecurityComputer Security articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (assessed as Mid-importance).

Things you can help WikiProject Computer Security with:

Article alerts will be generated shortly by AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information...

Review importance and quality of existing articles
Identify categories related to Computer Security
Tag related articles
Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests)
Identify articles for improvement
Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

Merging/Removing

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I don't think this should be merged either. A honeypot wants attackers to come to it. A honeyclient goes and finds the attackers! They're two completely different paradigms.

Bob Dole

I dont think this page should be merged with general honeypots. When one talks about honeypots, they usually mean server honeypots. Client honeypots are quite different. A merged page would be quite large.

I do, however, would support merging this page with the page Honeymonkey. Honeymonkey is a specific implementation of client honeypots and it would make sense to merge them into one page.

CHristian

I don't think so, because Honeymonkey is a variant of a farm of honeyclients from microsoft. It would be the same to mix lemonade into the article CocaCola. And honeyclients are a sort of security software/device not a specific implementation/application. They are getting more and more important.

Riker2000

I dont follow. Honeymonkey is a specific implementation of a client honeypot. This page describes the general concept of client honeypots as well as lists specific implementations, which honeymonkey is.

cseifert

I'm against the merging of Client Honeypot/Honeyclient with either Honeymonkey or Honeypot. Honeypot is a global concept, and is first associated with server honeypot. Client honeypot is a derivation of the original concept with a major difference (inverted paradigm). Honeymonkey is a particular implementation.

It's similar (for me) to automobile>electric car>Tesla Rodster, and each concept is mentioned in its neighbor's articles (yet there are 3 articles). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aptarus (talk • contribs) 16:39, 9 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Renaming

I would recommend to rename this article to Honeyclient(Security Device) in contrast to Honeyclient(Software). I am doing this because when we call this Client Honeypots than the logical naming for normal Honeypots should be Server Honeypots, this isn't the case and Honeypot is well known over years, also Honeyclient is well known as a Security Device?!

Riker2000

I am concerned of naming this honeyclient as the term is too much in line with a specific implementation and would make it difficult to differentiate between the general concept and the specific implementation. I think "client honeypot" nicely captures what we are dealing without this danger. I also think that the term "server honeypot" is a term that one starts seeing more and more due to the recent introduction of client honeypots and if one wants to be more accurate then he will talk about server honeypots and not just honeypots. That said, I wonder whether we should create a page on honeypots, which just describe the general concept applicable to both client and server honeypots and then move the traditional server honeypot stuff to a page named "server honeypots".

cseifert

Then we should rename it to Client honeypot but Client honeypot / honeyclient (section) is a confusing name.

Riker2000

I agree to renaming it to client honeypot.

cseifert

External links modified

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Client honeypot. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070930043825/http://dewy.fem.tu-ilmenau.de/CCC/22C3/video/mp4/22C3-871-en-honeymonkeys.mp4 to http://dewy.fem.tu-ilmenau.de/CCC/22C3/video/mp4/22C3-871-en-honeymonkeys.mp4

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:44, 19 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Client honeypot. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:37, 9 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic