Talk:Clinton, Massachusetts

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Copyvio?

edit

Is the recent edit a copyright violation from here? I'd be loath to just go and delete it, though, since it's interesting and useful information. AJD 17:43, 13 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

It was. That may be usable as a source, but not by copying. The history section of the article was a copyright violation from 13 September to 17 October. Don't let it revert to those versions. GRBerry 16:41, 17 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Baseball Field

edit

I don't really care what baseball field is oldest. I care about sourcing. The Guiness Book claim can be sourced to that book so doesn't urgently need a source. (It would be best if someone with a copy produced a proper {{cite book}} citation, but I know from a filler news story that the statement is in the Guiness book.) Any claim about something else needs a reliable source, not original research on the part of an editor. And even once sourced, may or may not merit inclusion here. GRBerry 22:02, 14 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Clinton, Massachusetts. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:32, 26 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Clinton, Massachusetts. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:21, 9 August 2017 (UTC)Reply