Talk:Clipping the church
A fact from Clipping the church appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 12 October 2008, and was viewed approximately 4,510 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Tankersley
editThis appears to be mainly personal knowledge, which is not appropriate for Wikipedia, or possibly copied from some church document, which would be plagiarism. It is not properly referenced and repeats information given elsewhere. It is also not limited to Tankersley. If the various statements can be specifically verified, some may have a place in the main article. Chemical Engineer (talk)
- Small mention here. Surprised there is not more on the web. There may be perfectly good printed sources if someone were to look hard enough. Martinevans123 (talk) 22:13, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Clipping the church. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111129011429/http://www.avpu52.dsl.pipex.com/Clypping%20the%20Church.html to http://www.avpu52.dsl.pipex.com/Clypping%20the%20Church.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:08, 9 August 2017 (UTC)