Talk:Cliqz

Developers?

It would be good to have the names of the developers of the software. If the company or its users have disclosed their identities, (such as in their source code, which has been open sourced) their reputations (which may be well-known, such as by other public activities - such as on github, in security flaw disclosures, privacy discussions, etc. ) would be tied to the software, which could make it significantly more trustworthy. If they've been disclosed, I think the info would be encyclopedic. Thoughts? Would it make you trust the software more or less? Would me! --IP.