Talk:Clive Loader

Learn more about this page

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Military

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Military history: Aviation / Biography / British / European C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Military biography task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

Bedford school web page as a source

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I wonder whether anyone else has the same uneasy feeling about accepting a school webpage as a biography for the new Crime commissioner elect?
It sounds like a really bad joke not a reliable source. Any thoughts about where we can get anything better? JRPG (talk) 23:24, 16 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Spoiled ballots?

Latest comment: 11 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

The article, quoting from the Leicester Mercury, says "More than 8400" ballot papers were spoilt or incorrectly filled in." This source, however, used in England and Wales Police and Crime Commissioner elections, 2012, says: "The total number of ballot papers rejected at the first count is 3,371". Loader got 48.43% of the valid first round votes, not "47%". He was elected as a result of the second round votes, of which he got 64.66%. Martinevans123 (talk) 16:09, 1 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Marvellous. I don't trust either source now, the merc as it may be the results were being altered as it was printing and the NW Leicestershire results as it managed to lose the edge of the rh column from the spoilt ballot papers figures. The Guardian report which allows sorting of the data has 2.65% spoilt for Leicestershire (or Leiscestershire as it spells it elsewhere :)) and 15.92% turnout. I've downloaded the spreadsheet, it looks excellent and it should give all the information needed. Hopefully adding up the numbers in the spreadsheet won't be deemed wp:or. Feel free to alter, I'm out for a few hours now. JRPG (talk) 17:20, 1 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Have replaced the Mercury figure and source with that Guardian percentage and source. Not sure what to do about that other percentage and turnout figure. Martinevans123 (talk) 17:32, 1 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Sorry for the delay in replying, and thanks for making the changes. The Guardian should be the most reliable source for everything post election. I'm not sure if there are still contradictions, but if so on this occasion, the Guardian should have precedence. You can quote this talk page discussion if changing a source. Regards JRPG (talk) 20:58, 5 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Clive Loader. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.bedfordschool.org.uk/default.asp?page=1500
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121117021957/http://clive4leicspcc.com/home.html to http://clive4leicspcc.com/home.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:38, 9 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Clive Loader. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:20, 8 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic