Talk:Clondalkin

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

General comments

edit

Maybe parts of north Clondalkin, i.e. Ronanstown, Quarrayvale, etc have some poverty but in general, I think Clondalkin is quite prosperous at the moment. Crime is no worse than anywhere in the city of Dublin.

I love how the petshop is listed as a main attraction. Who put that in there? 89.100.51.85 02:50, 26 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Toastmasters

edit

I have removed some of the Toastmaster information because it is blatant advertising. If people are interested in knowing more about the club they will click on the link and the club's website should have all the details. I'm not against Toasties, I've been a member for a few years, but Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. Roaming27 10:39, 25 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Yes it certainly was blatant advertising. I've rewritten it some more, it should be NPOV now. --Hibernian 16:06, 25 January 2007 (UTC)Reply
Thank you Hibernian  :-) Roaming27 00:20, 26 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Local clubs

edit

This needs a bit of a clean-up. Some of it is not really notable and some of it is advertising. I'll try and make some time to re-word some of it. If anyone wishes to discuss any issues please post here, thanks. Roaming27 10:43, 25 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

The Round Tower

edit

I'd say put more in about the Round Tower, the GAA club of the same name and the Gaelscoil, since the latter 2 are the first in Ireland.


Darn tootin'! I found a picture here http://media.photobucket.com/image/clondalkin%20round%20tower/hutton001/ClondalkinRoundTower.jpgFile:Http://media.photobucket.com/image/clondalkin round tower/hutton001/ClondalkinRoundTower.jpg

I noticed the article on Round Towers doesn't link here. We've one of the best examples in the world so I reckon it deserves a mention.89.100.38.132 (talk) 20:42, 17 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Edit

edit

I have deleted Transport and added it into today. I am wondering should I add a map of the area. Any help and comments welcome.

Regards, NotnventedHere 22:53, 13 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Some verification is needed for the comment unemployment is higher in North Clondalkin. I will leave it in for now

Removed mention of local garage NotnventedHere 22:53, 13 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

A map wouldn't go astray :p —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shtanto (talkcontribs) 22:16, 13 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

1641 Rebellion

edit

Saying that the "native Irish" rose up against the "British" at this point in history is a bit over-simplistic. The Irish at this point would have included Norse descendants and various people from Great Britain and elsewhere, and not all of them rebelled. I'll have to go back to the history books for a better way of explaining it, but if anyone has a good idea in the meantime, go ahead.

Pertusaria (talk) 20:37, 18 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

I've changed it to be a bit more precise. I still want to tidy up the paragraph - it wasn't British occupation, as the Act of Union hadn't occurred yet; I don't remember exactly what they were rebelling against.

The change I've made can be attributed to Norman Davies' "The Isles: a history", but I don't want to add it in yet in case it gives the false impression that the reference supports the whole sentence, which Davies would not agree with.

Pertusaria (talk) 08:51, 29 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Drat, I meant Norman Davies above, where I previously posted Norman Jeffries. My apologies to the author and to anyone who was misled.

Pertusaria (talk) 15:15, 29 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

I finished up the general material on 1641 and put in the references. I've no idea about Clondalkin's role in the rebellion, so I can't help with that reference.

Pertusaria (talk) 23:34, 29 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Education

edit

The section on education claims that schools in Clondalkin are from "many denominations". I strongly suspect that they are only from Roman Catholic and Anglican (Church of Ireland) denominations, but I may be wrong. Does anyone have an example of one which is of a different denomination?

Pertusaria (talk) 15:43, 29 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Clondalkin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:31, 11 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Clondalkin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:01, 26 November 2016 (UTC)Reply