Talk:Clovis point

Indigenous peoples of the Americas Mid‑importance

	Indigenous peoples of the Americas portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the Americas, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indigenous peoples of the Americas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of the AmericasWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the AmericasTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the AmericasIndigenous peoples of the Americas articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Indigenous peoples of North America Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archaeology B‑class High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
B	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Impact event and Clovis

Latest comment: 15 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

What effect, if any, did the hypothesized meteorite impact event of 12,9 kya have on Clovis (read humans already in the Americas)? Doesn't Clovis fade out about the same time? Did this event kill or weaken the megafauna enough to drive them to extinction? ^[1] Twalls (talk) 08:08, 12 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Evidently not much. Megafauna extinctions started before that and ended thousands of years after it. Additionally, Clovis lasted another century afterward.--Windustsearch (talk) 01:33, 9 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

According to this study[1], the impact event may have caused an immediate population decline as well as behavioral and cultural changes. Twalls (talk) 22:21, 12 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7329505.stm —Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.108.16.214 (talk) 07:48, 4 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

References

^ http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/3629e596-6d60-11dc-ab19-0000779fd2ac.html

"...disappeared from the continental United States"?

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Under the heading "Age and cultural affiliations", the first sentence of the second paragraph states "Around 10,000 radio carbon years before present, a new type of fluted projectile point called Folsom appeared in archaeological deposits, and Clovis-style points disappeared from the continental United States." (emphasis mine) Since the boundaries of the "continental United States" as an area were gradually and arbitrarily formed between 1787 and 1912, wouldn't it make more sense to use "North America" as the continental area being described? Bricology (talk) 21:24, 29 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Internal contradiction

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

If all known points date from "roughly 13,400–12,700 years ago", meaning roughly 11,400–10,700 BCE, how can the one in the first image be dated "11500-9000 BC"? Even on these time scales, a discrepancy in the end dates of the ranges by 1700 years is too much. Both ranges are unsourced. BTW, has the label "DSC07376" anything to do with this specific artifact, or is it the code assigned by the digital camera, a DSC-H55? --Lambiam 07:48, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Clovis transition

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your right, and since the Clovis in Europe has no flutes. But the same basic points without, and the theory is they came from Europe. So it all fits that Clovis began in Europe. It evolved in north America. Then evolved further into Folsom, the longer blood groove was twice as deadly as a Clovis with it's short hafting groove. 174.212.224.205 (talk) 13:16, 8 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic

[1] ttp://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/3629e596-6d60-11dc-ab19-0000779fd2ac.html

[1]