Talk:Cluck-U Chicken
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Cluck-U Chicken article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article was nominated for deletion on March 27, 2007. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Should this page exist?
editI don't think this page has any notability. I may nominate it for deletion but I'd rather discuss it here first.
Seraphim Whipp 19:49, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Yea some people eat there and why should it be up for deletion its knowledge? What does it hurt by having it there?
- "Some people eat there" is not a valid reason to keep this article. Some people eat in my college canteen but it doesn't mean that it qualifies as a subject for a wikipedia article.
- Seraphim Whipp 10:58, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
- I heard about this place on a Discovery Channel special about the Ten Best Places to Pig Out. They talked for about 5 minutes for each place, and they talked about Cluck U, and the "911" Challenge. http://travel.discovery.com/fansites/worldsbest/pigout/pigout_03.html--Unexplainedbacon 05:51, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
- All issues regarding the existence and notability of this article have been discussed on the nomination for deletion. Also I'd add that link in somewhere because this article is poorly sourced and it would make a good addition.
- Seraphim Whipp 10:17, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
No, I don't work for Cluck-U
editI read over that VFD, and as the author of the article, I can say no, I don't work for Cluck-U. I usually only eat there once a year since I go to school far away from it. But I do know that there are (reliable) sources out there that can vouch for the notability of this place. I must admit back when I wrote the article I was unaware of Wikipedia's sourcing policy. And I should admit that there are some things that are questionable (the comments about the Morristown, NJ location, the one I eat at, I think should be removed, for example). --Sir Crazyswordsman 18:21, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
Remove advertising materials
editI dont think there is any way statements such as " "Sugar Bees" and "Honey Bees" have been cited as perfect companions to a hot winger meal because of their heat zapping capabilities, and their hot bites have been reported as a snack food without equal." are verifiable or citable. These should be removed. Salil.gokhale 18:35, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Restaurants or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. You can find the related request for tagging here -- TinucherianBot (talk) 08:52, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Cluck-U Chicken. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090513043402/http://www.cluckuchicken.com/locations_international.htm to http://www.cluckuchicken.com/locations_international.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070902172910/http://travel.discovery.com/ideas/food-wine/supersize/supersize_03.html to http://travel.discovery.com/ideas/food-wine/supersize/supersize_03.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:08, 9 August 2017 (UTC)