Talk:Clyde Tombaugh

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (January 2018)

Untitled

edit

The caption under the photo of Tombaugh is not at Lowell. It's likely his home in Kansas. The telescope pictured is the first successful one he made and it helped get him the job at Lowell. -Liam McDaid — Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.196.0.13 (talk) 20:39, 12 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Untitled

edit

The latest edit has changed "...discovered Pluto..." to "discovered the dwarf planet Pluto..." While it's true that Pluto has been demoted, it could be understood as meaning it was always considered a dwarf planet. I think it's cleaner to just say "discovered Pluto." Let the Pluto article deal with its travails from 'unidentified thing' to 'planet' to 'dwarf planet.' Boxjam 00:36, 25 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

I like the article, but can you include more about family life???

reliable source?

edit

The article says:

"I have seen three objects in the last seven years which defied any explanation of known phenomenon, such as Venus, atmospheric optic, meteors or planes. I am a professional, highly skilled, professional astronomer. In addition I have seen three green fireballs which were unusual in behavior from normal green fireballs...I think that several reputable scientists are being unscientific in refusing to entertain the possibility of extraterrestrial origin and nature." [1]

Is there a verifyable and reliable source for this? Bubba73 (talk), 01:54, 31 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

It's also in the Michael Swords article on Tombaugh in the external references. Dr Fil 11 January 2006
Which one is the Michael Swords one? Bubba73 (talk), 19:08, 11 January 2006 (UTC)Reply
The one that says "Academic paper..." Dr Fil 13 January 2006

Biography

edit

A biography of someone reported as leaving a widow ought to include a mention of a marriage. 94.30.84.71 (talk) 18:53, 9 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Confusing dates and tone of paragraph

edit

in the section Interest in UFOs, it states "In 1949, Tombaugh had also told the Naval missile director at White Sands Missile Range, Commander Robert McLaughlin, that he had seen a bright flash on Mars in August 1941, which he now attributed to an atomic blast." From the tone of the paragraph, it apparently says that Tombaugh dismisses the flash on Mars as a reflection of an atomic blast. This would be difficult as the first terrestrial atomic detonation didn't occur until 1944. BruceWiley (talk) 16:04, 9 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

It is confusing. It is not clear to me whether he thought the atomic blast was on Earth or on Mars. It so happens that a few days ago I ordered the biography of Tombaugh, and I'll see if that clears it up. Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 17:02, 9 August 2012 (UTC)Reply
Well, I got his biography and there is no mention that I can find of this, nor UFOs, nor green fireballs. Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 04:57, 13 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Interred vs. interned

edit

In the paragraph on Tombaugh's death, I removed the "sic" from the transcription of the message on the canister of his ashes attached to the New Horizons space probe. The canister states "Interned herein are the remains..."[1] This is, in fact, the word that was intended; not "interred." From the Latin terra,"interred" means to be buried in the Earth.[2] This makes no sense in the context of space. "Interned," on the other hand, can mean "to confine,"[3] as in an internment camp. The usage on the probe is correct; "sic" is unnecessary. Feline Nursery (talk) 03:57, 14 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

I've removed the "sic" which has since reappeared. Feline Nursery's reason's for deleting it are good. Peter Ells (talk) 23:51, 15 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

References

edit

2nd hyperlink at this reference [23] which is obtained by clicking on "the original" in the pop up box is in error - http://virtuallystrange.net/ufo/updates/2004/sep/m20-022.shtml, translated with google translate it has no internal search for Clyde Tombaugh Saparonia (talk) 22:01, 31 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. I have changed the reference to suppress the out of date link. Grafen (talk) 09:03, 2 January 2017 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Clyde Tombaugh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:07, 9 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Clyde Tombaugh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:25, 21 January 2018 (UTC)Reply