Talk:Co-option (biology)

Viruses Low‑importance

	Viruses portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Viruses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of viruses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirusesWikipedia:WikiProject VirusesTemplate:WikiProject Virusesvirus articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Article title

Latest comment: 1 month ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Comment The Wiki is not a dictionary WP:NOT. You may wish to change the articles title too "Co-option in Biology" or perhaps "Co-option (Biology)" to avoid possible problems with ambiguities. I hope my comment has been received as it has been suggested. Good luck to you. --User:Warrior777 (talk) 18:45, 28 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Right now the article says this:

The term co-option refers to the capacity of intracellular parasites to use host-cell proteins to complete their vital cycle.[citation needed] Viruses use this mechanism, as their genome is small.

This doesn't appear to be true. The cited reference (the virology paper) doesn't even use the term co-option.

I am turning the page into a redirect to exaptation which has an explanation of the term in the context of evolutionary biology. ShiveryPeaks (talk) 11:51, 7 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic