Talk:Co-production (approach)
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Article name
editI propose that, in accordance with WP:PRECISION, this article be renamed to Coproduction (public services). 152.16.16.75 (talk) 00:16, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
Disagree - 'co-production (public services)' is too vague - it is sometimes used to refer to inter-organisational co-production of public services - the current title of this page specifically avoids this imprecision. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tony Bovaird (talk • contribs) 00:21, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
Er, I don't suppose "CoPSSUC" would catch on? Oh, never mind me. Bpdlr (talk) 23:47, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
- Shouldn't this be Co-production (public services), with the hyphen? Thanks, DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 11:54, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Yes it should. I have only seen it with the hyphen here in the UK.Izzawiki (talk) 23:10, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
References
editWe need actual references, not a list at the end. Secretlondon (talk) 00:16, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
Fixed.Wipsenade (talk) 18:17, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
Lambeth
editI have added a peace on Lambeth council.Wipsenade (talk) 16:06, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
Criticisms and Responses
editWho whole of this section is un-referenced, and seems to be unknown persons personal views. It may be plagiarized from somewhere even. I'd quite like it to be deleted because I can't see a reason for it to be here. Views? Justifications? Suggestions? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Izzawiki (talk • contribs) 17:20, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Coproduction (public services). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140726001458/https://socialcam.com/v/va50IEZN?autostart=true&fs=twitter&fsk=6ilFTdlt to https://socialcam.com/v/va50IEZN?autostart=true&fs=twitter&fsk=6ilFTdlt
- Added
{{dead link}}tag to http://lx.iriss.org.uk/content/co-production-public-services-new-partnership-citizens - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110518073748/http://www.valueforpeople.co.uk/co_production to http://www.valueforpeople.co.uk/co_production
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110722055619/http://www.publicservice.co.uk/feature_story.asp?id=15861 to http://www.publicservice.co.uk/feature_story.asp?id=15861
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:30, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
Relationship between STS approach and public services approach
editIs anyone able to explain the relationship between: 1) the concept of co-production as used by Jasanoff and other STS scholars to analyze the ways scientific ideas and political institutions evolve together; and 2) the concept of co-production as adopted by natural and social scientists committed to working with stakeholders to produce knowledge that better serves communities? These seem to me to be fundamentally different projects (although with potentially interesting overlaps), and it would be good if the Wikipedia page could clarify that. 76.119.100.142 (talk) 14:08, 7 December 2023 (UTC)