Talk:Coaches Poll
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editRated high since it is a promenient feature of CFB and likely to be linked from many articles. --MECU≈talk 16:03, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
Required Addition
editIf anyone knows....Please add details concerning the Polls initial (month) and weekly release (day of week and aprox time).
Interesting little writeup on the poll
editBrief little writeup on the history of the poll. http://philsteele.com/Misc%20Pages/phil'sweeklynote.html in the section "Top 25 Coaches' Poll."↔NMajdan•talk 02:40, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
Coaches' Poll or Coaches Poll?
editUSA Today, which owns the poll, refers to it as the Coaches' Poll (including the possessive apostrophe). Any thoughts on correcting it here? 76.187.17.173 02:39, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, that does seem like it would be a good move. (76.27.145.6 (talk) 01:53, 10 January 2008 (UTC))
- I agree. On USA Today's own website, they refer to it as the Coaches' Poll. Wikipedia ought to promote good grammar. (Even though I'm not sure if 'good grammar' is the correct way to say it. ha) I'll see if I can change the title while maintaining the links. CougRoyalty (talk) 22:37, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject class rating
editThis article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 08:08, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
Vandalism
editThe first few sentences in the article seem to have been tampered with. I'm a newbie on Wikipedia so I'm not sure how to revert. Mathiusdragoon (talk) 02:59, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
How is it determined which coaches get to vote in the poll?
editThere are, after all, significantly more than 59 Division I FBS coaches. 75.76.213.106 (talk) 00:37, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Coaches Poll. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110716213517/http://www.tfponline.com/news/2008/dec/09/epps-always-coaches-poll-shows-biases/ to http://www.tfponline.com/news/2008/dec/09/epps-always-coaches-poll-shows-biases/
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://espn.go.com/los-angeles/ncf/story/_/id/8263986/new-no-1-usc-trojans-lane-kiffin-gives-vote-usa-today-coaches-poll
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:37, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
Did it get renamed or add a sponsor?
editIs the coaches' poll now sponsored by US LBM? 47.152.207.163 (talk) 00:59, 16 October 2023 (UTC)