Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 March 2021 and 28 June 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Richies908, Bizhao246.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 17:54, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hard to read

edit

This article is becoming confusing. There is a mishmash of information, some of it overlapping, duplicating. A lot needs to be pruned, while still considerable information is missing. The page needs a head to toe overall. The intro is inadequate. Much of the information is almost a decade old. There isnt enough about the industry, the consequences, the impact on transport etc... this gives an incomplete perspective and is almost distorted. Kudos to anyone who can improve this! Ottawakismet (talk) 20:45, 3 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Capacity projections for 2010 and 2030

edit

The numbers seem a bit fishy, since the 2006 capacity is at most 300 GW and the 10%/year growth rate is not consistent with 852 GWe of coal-based capacity by 2010. Xenonice (talk) 02:56, 20 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Good catch. Energy policy of China gives:

In 2006, China's total annual electricity output was 2.83 trillion kWh, and the annual consumption was 2.82 trillion kWh (second largest in the world). The total installed electricity generating capacity was 622 GW in 2006, and hit 710 GW by the end of 2007. [15]

I don't think it was 300 GW in 2006, but the rest of it could be right. -Theanphibian (talkcontribs) 04:21, 3 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

The 484GW installed capacity for 2006 actually refers to Thermal Gross Capacity (that includes oil and gas, source: ENERDATA 2006 data) and not coal-fired generators alone. It is however a good proxy of coal power capacity as oil+gas account only for 3.5% of thermal energy produced in 2005 (source IEA). The 300GW estimate appears therefore too low. 213.140.6.103 (talk) 08:39, 28 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

domestic use of coal

edit

I notice that there is an entire industry catered to the domestic use of coal fire. http://images.google.com/images?q=蜂窝煤 shows there are standard size coal bricks that fit into stoves for home use. I think that is a huge aspect not explored by this article. Kowloonese (talk) 23:40, 1 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Accidents in coal mines

edit

There is no separate article only focused on Chinese coal mine disasters in general with historic estimations on lethal accidents available on Wikipedia right now, I think some people are consistently taking away this kind if information, in any case it is really needed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.237.92.194 (talk) 14:57, 13 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Requested move

edit
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Jenks24 (talk) 05:02, 10 June 2012 (UTC)Reply



Coal power in the People's Republic of ChinaCoal in China – This article was created as Coal power in China. This time that was a correct title as it dealt only with the coal-fired power generation in China. However, at its current state it deals with all aspects related to the Chinese coal industry and not only with the coal-fired power generation. Therefore, the more broader title is needed. The new title Coal in China will be in line with the Coal in country X series. At the moment, this is a redirect to this page. As for title, I am ready to accept also Coal in the People's Republic of China as an alternative; however, Coal in China is more simple and it will be most likely more widely used search term. Beagel (talk) 18:07, 2 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Split

edit

There is a long list of accidents. As it is in the list form, it suits better as a separate list. Although safety is a crucial aspect which should be included here, I have some doubts if the full list belongs here. Beagel (talk) 07:07, 3 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Was split into List of coal mining accidents in China. Beagel (talk) 08:25, 9 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Coal in China. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:47, 22 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

When did Chinese coal consumption peak?

edit

The 1st sentence of the 2nd paragraph says that both production and consumption peaked in 2013. Yet the very next sentence says that consumption peaked in 2014. So which is it? Plazak (talk) 20:24, 1 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Coal in China. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:14, 27 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Coal in China. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:04, 9 August 2017 (UTC)Reply