Talk:Cockermouth (UK Parliament constituency)
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editAnybody got any sources to check the James Graham who was MP for Cockermouth from 1802-1812? By the dates that Rayment gives it seems to be the same man who was MP for the Wigtown Burghs 1805-6, but he was elected there in August, after he had been re-elected in Cockermouth, and the next MP in Wigtown was not elected until November the following year, which sounds a long gap if it was simply a case of an MP choosing between two seats. I am beginning to suspect that the Cockermouth MP may have been Sir James Graham, 1st Bart, who became MP for Carlisle at the same time this James Graham stopped sitting for Cockermouth. I suspect the dates in Rayment's baronetage are wrong, because he has identical dates for the 1st Bart of Kirkstall and the 1st Bart of Netherby. And I'm wondering which of those two was really MP for Carlisle and which for Ripon - the Cumberland baronet whose son sat for Carlisle and for the county sounds a likelier bet than the Yorkshire baronet who must have lived near Ripon? Any ideas on cross-checking? Rgmmortimore 21:32, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Cockermouth (UK Parliament constituency). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150904125310/http://www2.odl.ox.ac.uk/gsdl/cgi-bin/library?e=p-000-00---0modhis06--00-0-0-0prompt-10---4------0-1l--1-en-50---20-about---00001-001-1-1isoZz-8859Zz-1-0&a=d&cl=CL1 to http://www2.odl.ox.ac.uk/gsdl/cgi-bin/library?e=p-000-00---0modhis06--00-0-0-0prompt-10---4------0-1l--1-en-50---20-about---00001-001-1-1isoZz-8859Zz-1-0&a=d&cl=CL1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:08, 10 August 2017 (UTC)