Talk:Cocktails (The Office)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Gen. Quon (talk · contribs) 23:12, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

I will review this article soon.--Gen. Quon (talk) 23:12, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   LEAD, no summary or mention of production

   Also, no need to cite something in the lead if you cite it else where in the article, so you can remove citation No. 1

   I would add the Episode citation after the guest stars on the infobox, right after the last one

   "Roy brings his brother, who "took a bath" selling their jet skis." What does this mean? He took a bath after selling the skis? Or he took a bath while selling them?

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   OK, OfficeTally is citing an official NBC document, but it is a fan cite. Might I suggest you cite the actual NBC press release? Here is a template for a press release, the only thing that isn't there is the url, which seems to be broken. (Just because I'm nice, the citation template would look like: {{cite press release |title=Feb. 27, 2007 Press Release ("Cocktails")| archiveurl =http://www.officetally.com/the-office-nielsen-ratings/2| archivedate =10 October 2008|url= http://www.nbcumv.com/release_detail.nbc/entertainment-20070227000000-nbcratingsresults.html|publisher=NBC|date=27 February 2007|accessdate=23 January 2012-01}})

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Thorough coverage, no sign of trivia

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   Neural POV

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   No edit warring

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Two pictures, properly tagged. All good

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   On hold for seven days for above issues to be addressed.--Gen. Quon (talk) 23:32, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for the review. I believe I addressed all of your comments (let me know if adding the ref to the infobox guest stars is what you meant). Thanks, Ruby 2010/2013 02:40, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

No problem, I love The Office. Yeah, that's what I meant! Congrats! I pass the article!--Gen. Quon (talk) 15:43, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! Ruby 2010/2013 16:34, 24 January 2012 (UTC)