Talk:Coeluridae

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Coeluridae article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Dinosaurs Low‑importance

	Dinosaurs portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of dinosaurs and dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Compsognathidae

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I doln't have the paper in which Rauhut places Compsognathus, Mirischia, and Coelurus in the same family--however, there are a few issues. Very few paleontologists have adopted this usage of coeluridae, and I bet I know why. The name Compsognathidae predates the name Coeluridae! Any family that contains Compsognathus must be named Compsognathidae. Sereno discusses this on the TaxonSearch entry for Compsognathidae [1]. The whole coelurid thing is a mess, and I'm going to go ahead and re-structure, with a separate page for Compsognathidae, which is pretty well supported compard to Coeluridae. Any discussion of this stuff can go here, I guess.Dinoguy2 23:15, 9 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Coeluridae

Update the writing for Coeluridae. The family Coeluridae includes only two genera, Coelurus and Tanycolagreus. The two genera have a number of characters that provide support for a monophyletic Coeluridae.

Aren't coelurids tyrannosauroids?

Latest comment: 6 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Aren't coelurids tyrannosauroids? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brisio (talk • contribs) 13:35, 16 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

They've fallen out in that position is one or two analyses (actually I'm not sure if these were published or just posted online) but the idea hasn't yet gained wide acceptance or been really highlighted in the literature. Dinoguy2 (talk) 16:50, 16 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Nope, it's not! Ornitholestes have sickle claws, Ornitholestes are Coeluridae, Coeluridae are Dromaeosauroidea, but Coeluridae it's not related to Tyrannosaurs. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChrisTheWhaleKing (talk • contribs) 19:16, 22 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic