Talk:Cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 August 2021 and 8 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jdtully. Peer reviewers: MadeleineMarieC, Gottachecktheinfo.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:15, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): NupurG.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 17:57, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

"Patients"

This article refers to patient(s) 23 times (excluding the ref list). According to WP:MEDMOS, using that word is a sign of writing for the wrong audience, that is for (other) health professionals. --Hordaland (talk) 12:01, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Now down to six. --Hordaland (talk) 01:15, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

In many Social Work and Social Welfare professions, the persons recieving therapy are called "clients" or "consumers." These may be more appropriate terms to use. (But very interesting and well written article!) cReep (talk) 04:38, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

Article Evaluation

The article reads well with the topic clearly explained. All the citations and sources can be found in the References section. However, has more precise citations been added since February 2013? There is a tag above the article stating the current sources are unclear.

The article was created in 2010 and has had minor edits from many users since. However, I do not see any new information being added to the article.

I would suggest double checking references and updating information. I am sure there have been recent studies with CBT-I.

Jessg91 (talk) 13:53, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Jessg91 There was a template which said that the citations used in the article were not integrated with the text. Yes, spot on, this problem has been resolved for years. I removed the template. The article has problems, but that problem is not among them, and I see no particular reason for a problem template. Thanks. Blue Rasberry (talk) 20:25, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Merged 'sleep restriction to here

I merged what was a separate article about Sleep_restriction here but didn't import much of the content as I thought it didn't contribute enough to this article. Hope that's OK. --gilgongo (talk) 10:43, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

OK, as pointed out (and reverted) but Bgwhite, I stuffed it up. I'm going to try again, this time as an untargeted redirect so as to following the guidelines here --gilgongo (talk) 09:49, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Article reads like an advertorial

It strikes me that this article isn't very balanced: it seems to be significantly biased in favour of CBT-I as being The Solution™ and has little information about who it does and doesn't work for, what can realistically be expected (I'm sceptical about its glowing appraisal which seems to be rather repetitive) and what approaches might be considered if it turns out to be ineffective. On the contrary, as with CBT in general, it seems to place far too much emphasis on the failings of the patient should its outcome turn out to be lacking.

I don't have the knowledge to do a rewrite myself, and besides which I'm much too tired, but I think it does need significantly more neutrality than it appears to have at present. Vometia (talk) 15:57, 10 January 2020 (UTC)