Talk:Cold Heart (Pnau remix)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Cherrell410 (talk · contribs) 16:07, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):

   b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a. (reference section):

   b. (citations to reliable sources):

   c. (OR):

   d. (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a. (major aspects):

   b. (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):

   b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/fail:

   Amazing article, just one small mistake - everytime it was mentioned who was writing the article, it says "penned", which is a completely unnecessary synonym for written. Once that is fixed (which it does twice), then it will pass!

(Criteria marked are unassessed)

• Heyy @Cherrell410: hope you're well, I fixed the problem. Thank you :) Iaof2017 (talk) 12:49, 19 June 2023 (UTC)