Talk:College Park Interchange
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
Untitled comments
editIsn't I-495/95 interchange made in 1986? We have google misc. it said 1986.--Freewayguy Ask? +000s 21:12, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
It was, and the misc.transport.road citation was deleted because someone considered a newsgroup a nonauthoritative source. -TheOneKEA 19:50, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
Do we have any reliable sources?--Freewayguy What's up? 22:33, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
Does this even cite?--57Freeways 23:19, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
Name
editIs there a reliable source for calling this the "College Park Interchange"? Racepacket (talk) 12:40, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
Proposed merge with Interstate 495 (Capital Beltway)
editIt's not clear that a separate article on this interchange with an unverifiable name should exist. It would seem better as a mention in the article on the beltway. Toddst1 (talk) 18:18, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
- Support - Interchange details can easily be covered there and in the Interstate 95 in Maryland article. Dough4872 22:20, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
- Support — The article is unreferenced and mostly driving directions. The interchange is not notable. The only thing worth saving is the schematic graphic. Redirect to the Beltway article. VC 01:08, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
- Support – There's really nothing to save this as warranting its own article, and it itself seems rather non-notable. Besides, I've never seen the name "College Park Interchange" used anywhere in local media. —Onore Baka Sama(speak | stalk) 15:09, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
- Question - will the Springfield Interchange article also be merged?--Pubdog (talk) 01:31, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
- Support - The College Park Interchange along with the Springfield Interchange should be merged with Interstate 495 (Capital Beltway) as neither interchange is notable enough. A subtitle in the main page should suffice. StrigidaeMXV User talk:StrigidaeMXV 22:17, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
There seems to be consensus to merge this article into the Beltway article, so that is what I am going to do. Discussion about the Springfield Interchange should happen at that article. VC 23:45, 15 August 2013 (UTC)