Talk:College of Optometrists in Vision Development
Latest comment: 18 years ago by Natebw in topic Comment
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the College of Optometrists in Vision Development article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment
editWho is "we"? I cannot find a link to a discussion about COVD not being a medical assocaion. However, COVD does fit almost every element desribed in Medical association. --Natebw 00:03, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
- "We" is you and I. You said on my talk page: "It would seem quite absurd to categorize the American Academy of Optometry under Ophthalmolgy, for example. Likewise, there would be sufficient distinction to seperately categorize Optometry from Opticianry." Are you stating that optometry doesn't fall under ophthalmology but it falls under medicine? AED 21:18, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
- OK. I am following you now. What I am saying is that Optometry falls under "ophthalmology" (general discription of the study of the eye) but not "Ophthalmology" (specific medical discipline). I assumed that the category was the latter, based on the capital O. Am I wrong?