This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Collin Balester article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Collin Balester has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on May 2, 2011. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that in 2010, Washington Nationals pitcher Collin Balester (pictured) hit two batters in the head in a span of nine days? | |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
LIES LIES LIES ?
editI think there has been some graffiti on this page... 98.223.65.209 (talk) 01:19, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
- Haha, there was, but it has thankfully been removed.--Giants27(T|C) 02:10, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Collin Balester/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 21:53, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
- Fail - This article is supposed to be an encyclopedic biography of Balester. This article is not broad in its coverage, not in the slightest, and just focuses on his career. The article is a big large mess of statistics and player information, lacking coherence or any MoS form or layout. This article is very under-prepared, and also features all poorly formatted references.--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 23:29, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
- Huh, wasn't expecting an auto-fail, since this is hardly auto-fail worthy in my mind, but thanks for the review. Cheers,--Giants27(T|C) 04:47, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Collin Balester. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100120073850/http://collinbalester.com/ to http://www.collinbalester.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:23, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
External links modified (February 2018)
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Collin Balester. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121018144418/http://www.washingtontimes.com/weblogs/chatter/2009/aug/25/nats-sign-livan-demote-balester/ to http://www.washingtontimes.com/weblogs/chatter/2009/aug/25/nats-sign-livan-demote-balester/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:15, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Collin Balester/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: GhostRiver (talk · contribs) 02:22, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
I accidentally had too much fun at the local Irish pub tonight, so I will probably be reviewing this during teacher in-service time tomorrow. — GhostRiver 02:22, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
Infobox and lede
edit- Add "from 2008 to 2015" for the MLB sentence, either at the start or after the words "Major League Baseball (MLB)"
- Link the first instance of Prospect (sports) and designated for assignment in the lede
Early life
edit- Link the first instance of surfboard
- "His father makes "Balestar" surfboards, which are sold in most surf shops. Tom also runs a shop off of Slater Avenue in Huntington Beach." → "His father runs a surfboard shop off of Slater Avenue in Huntington Beach, and also makes "Balestar" surfboards, which are sold widely in surf shops."
- Use the "convert" template for "83mph" to make it 83 mph (134 km/h)
- Pipe "scout" to Scout (sports)
- WL the first instance of shutout
Washington Nationals
edit2004–2007
edit- Make sure you use an en dash instead of a hyphen for the subhead
- Spell out the WHIP acronym the first time that it's introduced
- Pipe "Washington" to Washington, D.C.
- "expecting to not receive" → "expecting not to receive" (I hear the voice of my mother telling me not to split my infinitives)
- "A week after being named to the Futures Game Roster, Balester was..." → "The following week, he was..."
- "So eager was he to join the Clippers," → "In his eagerness to join the Clippers,"
- No comma needed after "Tampa Bay Devil Rays"
2008
edit- Delink "striking out", already done in the early life section
2009
edit- Pipe "rotation" to starting rotation
- "for one of the final two spots"
- Lowercase "spring" in the second sentence
- "During Spring training, he went 1–1 with a 6.75 ERA, getting reassigned to the minors on March 28, though he remained a part of the organization's long-term plans." → "After going 1–1 with a 6.75 ERA during spring training, he was reassigned to the minors on March 28, but remained a part of the organization's long-term plans."
- Do we know what caused Zimmermann to go on the DL?
- Comma after "from free agency and"
2010
edit- "in order for him to convert to being a relief pitcher" → "to begin the process of converting him to a relief pitcher"
- Same as above, do we know why Atilano was hurt?
- I don't think you need to mention that Weeks played the following day; it's certainly not recommended to start again right after getting nailed in the head, but I'm pretty sure Tatis just did it after Kennedy beanballed him
- On second thought, maybe "Much like Weeks, Reynolds was fine" → "Neither batter suffered a serious injury"
2011
edit- I'm not sure the best way to reword this, but "to begin the season" shows up twice in consecutive sentences
- Link the first instance of designated for assignment
- Pipe "waivers" to Waivers (MLB)
Detroit Tigers
edit- Delink DFA here, as it should be linked earlier
Texas Rangers organization
edit- I'm wondering if there's more of a story here about the Tommy John surgery – did he leave the game with pain, had it been lingering? No worries if you can't find much more information, but worth checking out
- Didn't see anything about him leaving the game with pain (though I'd imagine that he did), but I did put that he struggled in that game, as well as a quote from when he returned in 2015 (in the Reds section). Sanfranciscogiants17 (talk) 22:16, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
- "In 6 games (5 starts) → "In six games (five starts)" per MOS:NUMBERS
Pittsburgh Pirates organization
edit- "After starting the 2014 season on the disabled list for the Triple-A Indianapolis Indians, he rehabbed with a couple of rookie-level teams, then joined the Double-A Altoona Curve on July 31." → "Although he was assigned to the Triple-A Indianapolis Indians, Balester opened the season on the disabled list and did not start pitching until he underwent a rookie-level rehab assignment. On July 31, he joined the Double-A Altoona Curve."
- Drop the context for Indianapolis in the second para, as you mentioned it in the first
Cincinnati Reds
edit- "recording 7 saves" → "and recorded seven saves"
- "a tie game" → "a tied game"
- WL walk-off home run
Samsung Lions
edit- "Making three starts for the Lions, he lost each of them, posting an 8.03 ERA." → "He lost all three starts that he did make for the Lions, and recorded an 8.03 ERA in the process."
- "and Balester considered retiring." → "and Balester considered retirement."
Last professional season
edit- I think you can shorten the WL to just "American Association", as that's what they tend to go by
Pitching style
edit- Same as earlier, wherever a speed is listed, use the convert template to include the km/h as well
- Elaborate on the back leg dropping – how specifically did that impact his release?
- Source doesn't say. Sanfranciscogiants17 (talk) 12:10, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
Personal life
edit- The part about his sister might fit better in the early life, with the other stuff about surfing
- Where it says "grew his mustache again", there haven't been previous references to said mustache, so it flows awkwardly
- I also assume this was a Movember thing, in which case that page should probably be linked
References
edit- In [17], change the work from "Pennlive.com" to The Patriot-News
- Detroit Free Press has a "The" in [58] but not in [52]; I believe not having it is the correct one
- "MiLB.com" is inconsistently capitalized (I'm looking at [47] in particular)
General comments
edit- We're going to disregard the any issues from previous GA nominations have not been adequately addressed criteria, as the previous review was an auto-fail from literally a decade ago.
- No stability issues (only one regular editor)
- Pictures are both allowed for use and are relevant to the article, as they all relate to the subject
- Earwig score looks good, the higher results are all attributed direct quotes
All the usual minor fixes – putting on hold for now, and ping me as always if you have questions! — GhostRiver 21:23, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
- Great work, passing now! — GhostRiver 15:27, 28 August 2021 (UTC)