Talk:Colombia–Israel relations
![]() | Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. Parts of this article relate to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing the parts of the page related to the contentious topic:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. If it is unclear which parts of the page are related to this contentious topic, the content in question should be marked within the wiki text by an invisible comment. If no comment is present, please ask an administrator for assistance. If in doubt it is better to assume that the content is covered. |
"Resolution 181 created Israel" is an incorrect statement
editOnce again, Wikipedia stands guilty of gross inaccuracy and misrepresentation of the facts. UN General Assembly Resolution did not nor did it have any authority to "create" any state. As is stated quite clearly in resolution itself, it merely "recommended" partition of Mandate Palestine into a Jewish and an Arab state. Israel did not become an independent country due to that resolution, because that resolution was rejected by the Palestinian "Arab Higher Commitee" and the Arab League by force of arms, was declared "unworkable" by the British Mandate authorities, and hence never carried over to the UN Security Council for implementation. Israel estalished itself, against all odds, and did not become a UN member until it had survived the devastating war of '48-'49 (no thanks to the UN). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.68.95.65 (talk) 19:32, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Colombia–Israel relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130114084628/https://tramites.cancilleria.gov.co/ciudadano/directorio/Misiones/enExterior.aspx to https://tramites.cancilleria.gov.co/ciudadano/directorio/Misiones/enExterior.aspx
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130114084628/https://tramites.cancilleria.gov.co/ciudadano/directorio/Misiones/enExterior.aspx to https://tramites.cancilleria.gov.co/ciudadano/directorio/Misiones/enExterior.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:32, 10 August 2017 (UTC)