Talk:Color volume
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Valery Zapolodov in topic A bit of projection?
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
.png){kind=small}
 | The contents of the Color volume page were merged into Color solid#Color volume on 6 August 2023. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
A bit of projection?
editThe statement "It's the result of a 2D color space or 2D color gamut (that represent chromaticity) combined with the dynamic range" is not supported by any of the three cited sources, none of which mention dynamic range. Can we get a better description? I agree there may be a notable topic here, but this content is too flimsy. Dicklyon (talk) 03:09, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, this definition is wrong. 3D volume existed first, area was derived later. Sure. 2D also represents Y, linear Y, it is just packed into one 2D image. This thing from rtings is very nice introduction. But people were obsessed over it for years, see "Colorimetry for HDTV" by LeRoy DeMarsh, that even discusses primaries of EUREKA 95. https://www.rtings.com/tv/discussions/GVJfNxZJK8fRvuyL/gamut-ring-diagrams-better-way-to-display-color-volume Valery Zapolodov (talk) 08:03, 20 September 2022 (UTC)