Talk:Colorado Party (Uruguay)

Uruguay High‑importance

	Uruguay portal This article is part of WikiProject Uruguay, an attempt to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to Uruguayan politics. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of objectives.UruguayWikipedia:WikiProject UruguayTemplate:WikiProject UruguayUruguay articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics: Political parties

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force (assessed as High-importance).

Conservatism Mid‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

No-section comment

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This page seriously needs a local expert to fix it up, because right now it's status is utterly awful. Gracias, Hauser 06:44, 2 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Article name

Latest comment: 11 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

I renamed this article (along with the Paraguayan equivalent) and it got reverted. The reason I did this is that the party's name is simply a color, and not a name that should be kept untranslated. In fact, the opposing party is simply called "Partido Blanco" (that's "white party"). Interesingly enough, in this case the article was given the proper name, instead of calling it "Rødt Party". --uKER (talk) 22:21, 25 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Britannica says: The two principal traditional political parties are the Colorado (“Red”) Party (which has had a liberal urban base) and the Blanco (“White”), or National, Party... [1]. "Colorado Party" is also the usual form found in both news and academic sources. Per WP:COMMONNAME, there is no case to rename. Rd232 ^talk 00:05, 26 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

What you're suggesting is the equivalent of the Spanish Wikipedia listing the US parties as "Partido Democratic" and "Partido Republican"; a ridiculous and unnecessary mix of English and Spanish considering the parties' names are plain words and not proper names, and as such they should just be translated. Coincidently with this, the article for the Red Party's opposing force is appropriately called "National Party (Uruguay)" and not "Nacional Party", and its lead lists its alternate name as "White Party" and not some nonsensical "Blanco Party". --uKER (talk) 03:51, 26 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Yes, the mixing of English and Spanish is a bit odd. But if that's the usual form in English for this subject (and it appears to be), then that's what the article name should be. That the usual form for other parties is different is irrelevant. Oh and for the National Party it may be that "National Party" is the usual form - it's harder to check that. But "Blanco Party" is more common than "White Party" in scholarly sources. Rd232 ^talk 09:58, 26 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hooray for consistency. --uKER (talk) 17:05, 26 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Yes - consistently using the most common name. Rd232 ^talk 17:13, 26 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Add topic