Talk:Colorado Railcar

Too Many Photographs

The quantity and quality of the photographs used here is questioned. There should only be 1 photo per article. They were poorly inserted and were interferring with the flow of text.

Five things. First, don't make a dozen minor edits and save each time. Edit many times, save once. Second, regarding your comment on having too many photos on that page, where in the Wikipedia article guidelines does it say to have only one image? BC Rail has ten images and it's a featured article. Third, the page needs more written content. That will help with page formatting. Fourth, the images' quality are what they are. Since Wikipedia requires free licenced or public domain images, the amount of available images is limited. If you don't like them, take your own superior images and submit them. Finally, you are free to fix it yourself if you don't like something. MrHudson 02:56, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

(P.S. Sign your comments)

To clarify, I meant too many for the size of the article. Can we expand the article? I love domes and the single level ultradomes.

trezjr 01:43, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

I did remove 1 photo today, because there simply isn't enough text to justify 3 photos that take up more room than the article.

If you want to replace it, add more text.

trezjr 01:05, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

DMUs

Quoth the article:

The Colorado Railcar DMU is a niche offering. The Colorado Railcar DMU is a niche offering. Where passenger trains run on active freight lines, US Federal regulations dictate the use of heavy rolling stock. This regulation prohibits the use of lighter, more advanced Japanese and European models -- except in cases where time segregation has been implemented."

This is a sort of confusing paragraph. It seems to imply (though doesn't come right out and say) that the Colorado Railcar DMUs aren't up to FRA regs. However, I thought the whole point of their DMU offering is that it can be run on active freight lines, unlike the European and Japanese cars. If it can't, then on what basis does it compete with those "more advanced" offerings? --Jfruh (talk) 00:23, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Merger Proposal

See: Talk:US Railcar --Bubblecuffer (talk) 19:58, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Colorado Railcar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110707062240/http://2knarf.com/CROH2005/index.html to http://2knarf.com/CROH2005/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:25, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Colorado Railcar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081119235324/http://www.djcoregon.com/articleDetail.htm/2008/10/09/TriMets-WES-is-delayed-Commuter-trains-signal-system-still-needs-to-be-tested-properly to http://www.djcoregon.com/articleDetail.htm/2008/10/09/TriMets-WES-is-delayed-Commuter-trains-signal-system-still-needs-to-be-tested-properly

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:24, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

more history

Apparently, CR formed to dodge impacts of Florida Fun Train collapse. Seeing some sites talk about financial hit CR might have taken from lost orders for Phillip Morris' luxury Marlboro Unlimited train. Would sites like trainweb.org qualify as legit Wikipedia source? May look for more info on these projects from newspapers/magazines.

• In general, no, sites on trainweb wouldn't be considered reliable without establishing that the author was a subject-matter expert. IIRC Karl Zimmermann discusses the Florida Fun Train in The GrandLuxe Express (2007), but I don't have it in front of me. Mackensen (talk) 01:45, 9 January 2020 (UTC)