Talk:Columba Ryan

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Contradiction

edit

Let's see, he was allegedly born in 1916, but 30 years later he was 36? Somebody get a calculator, because even traveling at relativistic speeds can's account for this glaring error. 98.248.33.198 (talk) 16:04, 19 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

I've tagged it as a contradiction, if the source is correct it couldn't have been 1946 but it could have been later. The source is reliable enough so I've contested the proposed deletion. snigbrook (talk) 16:25, 19 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

article by a banned user

edit

This article is by Peter Damian (via his socks), a banned user. Therefore subject to summary deletion on sight... IF no other user is willing to take responsibility. I so take responsibility. ... At first glance this seems a reasonable article, sourced to reliable sources, about a person who's notable enough to get an obit in the London Times. Not a valid speedy. If in fact it's made up or whatever (dubious, but IF)... take it to AfD rather than speedying it and let's talk about it. ++Lar: t/c 19:51, 19 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Columba Ryan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:02, 11 August 2017 (UTC)Reply