Talk:Comac

merge "China Commercial Aircraft Company" to this article

China Commercial Aircraft Company is as same as Commercial Aircraft Corporation of China Ltd. Commercial Aircraft Corporation of China Ltd. is the official English name of the company.--Jingandteller (talk) 20:50, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Per Wikipedia:Naming conventions (companies): "Convention: The legal status of the company (Inc., plc or LLC), is not normally included". Thus I've removed "Ltd," from the article name. It can still be included in the title line of the text. ("In the article itself, the title sentence of the article should include the abbreviated legal status.") - BillCJ (talk) 16:47, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was page moved.  Skomorokh  10:33, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

---

Commercial Aircraft Corporation of China → Comac — Simple name, like Boeing or Airbus. Comac is the name that everybody use. Thanks--Sophie2895 (talk) 11:57, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No consensus to move. Vegaswikian (talk) 00:26, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Comac → COMAC – COMAC should be in all uppercase letters like shown the website here. The company brands COMAC in all uppercase letters JetBlast (talk) 10:20, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

• Comment It does seem that COMAC was originally in uppercase but i am unable to find a discussion regarding this. --JetBlast (talk) 10:42, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
• Disagree. Per WP:MOSCAPS, branding does not matter. It is all caps if COMAC are initials. If it is spoken as though it is a word than it stays uncaptilised. Some fonts naturally have no lower cases, that isn't a reason to change the title of an article. --Falcadore (talk) 11:55, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
• Oppose per WP:MOSCAPS. The third-party sources in the article, where they use "Comac" at all, spell it as a proper noun and not as an acronym. (One source even uses CACC, a straight initialism.) As an additional note, this and related moves should have been discussed in a single place, rather than spread out among multiple articles. Powers ^T 15:45, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
• Oppose per WP:MOSCAPS. - BilCat (talk) 01:25, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Talk:Sukhoi_Superjet_100#Vote_on_flag_removal

This (inofficial) voting about flags and country info in orders might concern even this article. It is proposed to remove about 10.000 flags related to aircraft orders and articles including country info. Tagremover (talk) 10:22, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Comac. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110425032718/http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2008-05/11/content_8144727.htm to http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2008-05/11/content_8144727.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:06, 29 January 2018 (UTC)