This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
First I'll state that I am a member of this organization.
In the edit I did, I put the information of the former section of criticism inside the text and removed a dead link.
But I think that there is no need for a criticism information or section here. As also suggested in the wikipedia:NPOV and wikipedia:criticism guide, every NGO has someone to criticize it.
The criticism brought here is from a political advocacy organization, which does not add information to the reader in my opinion. if we'll start to quote every political organization' there will be no end t it.
As suggested in wikipedia:criticism, I think that Critique or evaluation information is more appropriate, and maybe should evaluate the organization. The 'critic' here is a reply to an un-quoted statement done by a member sometime, somewhere.
