Talk:Combeinteignhead

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Devon Low‑importance

	Devon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Devon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Devon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DevonWikipedia:WikiProject DevonTemplate:WikiProject DevonDevon articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Name

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

As you can see from the edit history, I was a bit too bold with this one! Combeinteignhead just looks so ugly! Web authors seenm to agree with Combeinteignhead getting 15600 Google hits and Combe-in-Teignhead getting 16800. But the OS gazeteer has the ugly alloneword version so I think we should go with that.

Mind you, I take the view that with English villages, the criterion for Wikipedia-ability should be civil parish, so this should really be a redirect to Haccombe with Combe (now why is that not called Haccombewithcombe?). -- RHaworth 16:56, 4 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Add topic