Talk:Combinatorics and physics

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Combinatorics and physics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110719115611/http://webserv.zib.de/Publications/Reports/SC-91-19.pdf to http://webserv.zib.de/Publications/Reports/SC-91-19.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:19, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Examples???

There are plenty of interactions between combinatorics and physics, but the examples on this page do not reflect this at all. Instead, they seem to be shameless self-promotion by certain scientists of their own narrow area of speciality. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.250.0.101 (talk) 03:08, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

If the "shameless self-promotion" of the previous comment was replaced by something more neutral like "idiosyncratic selections" I would completely agree with the previous comment even though it is also my own area of expertise. Who is to say what the reasons are, it might be shameless self-promotion, it might be ignorance, will-full blinkered ignorance of an experienced researcher who should known better, or naive ignorance of a beginner, or it might be someone who put in their favorite examples and assumed that someone else would fill in other examples. However, the problem remains that this article does not even begin to capture the interactions between combinatorics and physics more broadly. A look at recent articles in [1] gives a somewhat broader sense of the area, but still does not, I would say, capture all the important connections. 2003:CC:CF22:52A9:BDC5:9BAC:A977:2065 (talk) 09:16, 14 April 2019 (UTC)