Talk:Combinatorics on words

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Chomsky hierarchy and languages in general

edit

Certainly, combinatorics on words is very close to formal language theory and there is a considerable intersection of the two. However, they are not the same, so I would not classify an essentially language-theoretic concept such as the Chomsky–Schützenberger hierarchy as "the best known result in the field" (of CoW). For the same reason, I believe that the reference to formal languages in the first sentence is a bit misleading. fudo (questions?) 12:53, 4 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

I have some doubts too. I wonder if it actually stated like that in the source cited. 86.127.138.234 (talk) 02:57, 7 February 2015 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Combinatorics on words. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:19, 11 August 2017 (UTC)Reply