Talk:Commander Farsight (Warhammer 40,000)

Spelling

Can somebody confirm Farsight's spelling in the new Codex? The GW website is still using 'Kaius'. Cheers --Pak21 17:40, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

Anyone? I notice an anon IP has just reverted back to using "Kaius". Cheers --Pak21 10:44, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

well the spelling giving on the official site is Shas'o Viorla Shovah Kaius Montyr? Lowris 11:47, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

But there is an edit stating the new Codex spells it 'Kais' :-) Cheers --Pak21 16:17, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

hmmm i dont have access to a copy, a friend of mine plays tau though, hopefully he has the new codex, ill ask him asap and see if we can get the spelling verified Lowris 16:55, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

It's Kais. Tar7arus 21:46, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

No Aliens?

The article states that Farsight cadres cannot take any alien auxiliaries. Shouldn't we note Gue'vesa as an exception? They didn't make it into any of the Codices, but they still appear on the GW website and in Imperial Armour 3. 129.11.76.215 13:13, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

Says: "No Ethereals, Kroot or Vespid units may be included in O'Shovah's force" - I've seen Gue'Vesa at [GW site], but it's hidden away (WH40k -> Tau -> Tau Empire Archives (right at the bottom) -> Human Auxiliaries) and GW's site updating is pretty sporadic... Although if they made into IA3, that's pretty definitive. Tar7arus 21:46, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

100th Blade of Vaul

Hey, I was wondering if maybe the bit about the Vaul theory ought to be changed. To dismiss it, one would have to accept the Dawn of War novels as canon. I've never personaly read them, but BL novels are often not considered strictly canon, and have even been known to (occasionaly) include significant background errors.