Talk:Commander Keen/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Cognissonance (talk · contribs) 08:19, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Let's do this thing. Cognissonance (talk) 08:19, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Overall

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   It is featured article material.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

   The copyvio and external links checked out.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   It was focused, it was major, it was legendary.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   Nothing is more neutral than this article.

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   We have achieved peace, at last.

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   All is appropriate. I didn't see a nipslip, anywhere.

7. Overall: The review produced no notes and as such did not have a single issue. Immediate pass.

   Pass/Fail:

   @PresN: Cognissonance (talk) 10:01, 24 October 2016 (UTC)