Talk:Commerson's dolphin
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
 | The Commerson's dolphin article is part of the Cetaceans WikiProject. A discussion on the capitalisation of common names of cetaceans is taking place and your input is appreciated. Please see the the project talk page for the full rationale and comments. |
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Commerson's dolphin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110611112003/http://www.cms.int/documents/appendix/Appendices_COP9_E.pdf to http://www.cms.int/documents/appendix/Appendices_COP9_E.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:15, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
@Jason Quinn: Thanks for your additions, but Wikia shouldn't be used as it can be edited by anyone. I'll leave things for the moment if you want and are able to better source the names and ages, but if not then changes will need to be backed out. ~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 09:25, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
- I agree the material is poorly sourced at the moment and I'm aware of the deficiencies of the source. Maybe the whole section should be removed, or perhaps sent to the talk page for now. I had to leave the house earlier while working on that and knew the sources were an issue. In terms of actual reliability, not the Wikipedia definition of it, so far while gathering information on the captive dolphins the database has proven to be the most reliable source as other published material that would normally pass WP:RS has been either misleadingly out-of-date or simply wrong. I'll maybe remove the material for now until and work on it in a subpage until it's in better shape. Cheers, Jason Quinn (talk) 19:48, 31 July 2018 (UTC)