Talk:Common Engineering Entrance Examination

References for the future of ISEET

This is a sensitive and fast evolving new topic. Brushing aside new and current updates to the matter is not the solution. The changes made by endless users to this article is not vandalism, but introduction of new developments. The article must progress as the situtation develops. For this, i have added a new section, Future, to the article. We may also include another section, Status, if the need develops.

The following can be included, along with the new material into the article.

• IIT JEE 2013: Analysis of new exam pattern
• NEW PATTERN OF IIT JEE 2013
• Parents to move SC against new JEE pattern
• IIT JEE new pattern: Student from rural areas to suffer
• IIT Kanpur Faculty Opposes New IIT JEE 2013 Pattern
• IIT, NIT Admissions: 40% Weightage for 12th & 60% for JEE
• Dissent grows over new pattern of IIT-JEE
• IIT-JEE new pattern 2013 news

Opposition to the new pattern by IITs

• IIT Kanpur defies Kapil Sibal, to have own exam from 2013
• Kharagpur joins IIT-Kanpur band against Sibal
• After IIT Kanpur, more IITs may go against Kapil Sibal's common entrance test format
• IIT Kanpur And IIT Delhi Against The ‘One Nation One Test’ Anir1uph (talk) 22:59, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

Taking into account the latest developments, perhaps the article should be renamed? I don't have the time to give it deeper though right now, maybe tomorrow I'll come up with an idea for a title. --Muhandes (talk) 00:24, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

I agree, a new article title is required. Anir1uph (talk) 01:06, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

How about Joint Entrance Examination (India) ? --Muhandes (talk) 08:33, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

That'll be a bit confusing, given that the IIT-JEE was colloquially called JEE. I can't think of any name at all - the topic is in the news because of the controversy, and nothing else; so can we pick a title which will reflect that? Because after some months, the name of the test may possibly change for all we know; so we'll have to move the article again and all. Lynch7 08:57, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

What I mean to say is that let us make this article about the controversy and rename it appropriately, and when a final test pattern comes about (if at all it does), then lets create a new article for that. Lets face it, we don't have too much information about the exam pattern to create a good article. Lynch7 09:01, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

I agree with Lynch, that the name of the article must be such to incorporate future policy decisions. Another thing i can suggest is merging this article into a "Future of JEE" (or something like that) section in the Indian Institute of Technology Joint Entrance Examination itself. But this exam may also replace AIEEE, so that would be problematic. Anir1uph (talk) 09:29, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

How about India common engineering entrance examination proposal ? It seems to capture what this article is about without using any specific examination title. --Muhandes (talk) 11:07, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

I would suggest Common engineering entrance examination. The fact that it is indian and all its history of proposals can be included in the sections of the article. Anir1uph (talk) 20:48, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Anything is better than the current title. I boldly moved it. --Muhandes (talk) 11:34, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Please check this correction

"Two major engineering entrance examinations *are* used for admission to engineering..." These two examinations are now obsolete. Please consider changing it to *were*. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Khpatil (talk • contribs) 12:10, 14 May 2016 (UTC)