Talk:Common Jasmine Orange

Latest comment: 4 months ago by Dl2000 in topic Common JasminE Orange?

Common JasminE Orange?

edit

We may want to verify the spelling of "jasmine" in the album name. Google both versions of the spelling and you will see that "jasmine" version returns many more results. Emeraldhue 12:56, 19 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

I'm sure jasminE is correct, but the album uses Jasmin SeleneFN 20:14, 19 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

The page should at least be self-consistent. I think the only appearances of "Jasmin" are in the title and URL. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.82.10.143 (talk) 23:28, 14 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Agreed, the important thing is to be consistent and currently the article isn't. Personally, I think we should change everything to "Jasmine", in the absence of evidence that the misspelling is stylistic or otherwise intentional. But I would be almost as happy to see "Jasmin" everywhere instead. Chikinn (talk) 21:39, 10 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Just made things consistent - Jasmine with an E it is, available English references seem to concur. Dl2000 (talk) 00:56, 22 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Common Jasmin Orange. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:13, 28 November 2016 (UTC)Reply