Talk:Commonwealth v. Abu-Jamal
 | Daniel Faulkner was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 19 July 2012 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Commonwealth v. Abu-Jamal. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
 | The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
| While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Image copyright problem with Image:Daniel faulkner.jpg
edit
The image Image:Daniel faulkner.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
- That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --19:57, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
Cynthia White
editWhy does this not mention that 1) Cynthia White was never even near the scene, she simply lied about it, and 2) she provided this concocted lie (which, I might add, was partially proven false) to support the prosecution's side in return for her prostitution charges being vacated. Thus it served as a strategic advantage for the prosecution; she would serve as lead witness, and the story would be wholly accepted as true. This is because the presiding judge, Albert Sabo, was a racist and completely biased against Abu-Jamal. Sabo was willing to believe anything that implicated Abu-Jamal, an outspoken and politically charged African-American, no matter how inconsistent and false. McGill was well aware of this and used Cynthia White's false testimony, obtained through the prostitution charge deal, as the basis for all of the prosecution's case.
The death certificate information was actually inconsistent and highly suspicious; the fingerprints for the person listed on the death certificate, one "Cynthia Williams aka Mildred Saunders" did not even match Cynthia White's. While White was reputed to have died in 1992, the death certificate was actually listed as being issued in 1997, when this issue came up after Pamela Jenkins said that she had seen Cynthia White earlier that year. Moreover, I remember reading that the social security number from the death certificate in question was registered to a Puerto Rican woman. While it was known that White had very many aliases, why would her social security number be registered under a different name than her death certificate? J. 64.250.228.220 (talk) 08:59, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Commonwealth v. Abu-Jamal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080228075355/http://www.danielfaulkner.com/docs/MumiaTrialandPCRAAppealsTranscripts.pdf to http://www.danielfaulkner.com/docs/MumiaTrialandPCRAAppealsTranscripts.pdf
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.freemumia.com/pdfs/julybrief.pdf
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.cor.state.pa.us/deathpenalty/site/default.asp?portalNav=
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080912104929/http://www.ca3.uscourts.gov/casesofinterest/mumia/019014o.pdf to http://www.ca3.uscourts.gov/casesofinterest/mumia/019014o.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:47, 11 August 2017 (UTC)