Talk:Communications Security Establishment

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Communications Security Establishment article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Canada: Ottawa / Military Mid‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Ottawa (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the joint Canadian military and military history task force

Cryptography: Computer science Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cryptography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cryptography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CryptographyWikipedia:WikiProject CryptographyTemplate:WikiProject CryptographyCryptography articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computer science (assessed as Mid-importance).

Mass surveillance Low‑importance

	Communications Security Establishment is within the scope of WikiProject Mass surveillance, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of mass surveillance and mass surveillance-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, or contribute to the discussion.Mass surveillanceWikipedia:WikiProject Mass surveillanceTemplate:WikiProject Mass surveillanceMass surveillance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Intelligence / Canadian / North America

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Intelligence task force
	Canadian military history task force
	North American military history task force

Espionage Low‑importance

	Communications Security Establishment is within the scope of WikiProject Espionage, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of espionage, intelligence, and related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, or contribute to the discussion.EspionageWikipedia:WikiProject EspionageTemplate:WikiProject EspionageEspionage articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Clarification

The reference to 'National Defense Dept.' is not clear to me.

 They answer to the Minister of National Defence (with a "C" ;) )
 as you can see here:
 http://www.cse-cst.gc.ca/privacy/parliament-e.html

Recently dead link

Latest comment: 16 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

This web page recently went offline; I'm noting it here in case it resurfaces...

Communications Security Establishment - Unofficial Website

— Matt 08:07, 4 May 2004 (UTC)Reply

As I understood it the actual name is CSE:National Defense. That's what I have seen CSE called on their collective agreements when I worked at a federal labour law library. Dan Carkner

They seem to use "Communications Security Establishment" on their website. Their FAQ says, "2. When was CSE established? A:

CSE was formally established, by an Order-in-Council, in 1946 as the Communications Branch, National Research Council. In 1975, it was renamed the Communications Security Establishment and moved to the National Defence portfolio". I'd hazard an uninformed guess that the qualifier "National Defence" indicates what department of government the agency falls under. — Matt Crypto 19:56, 7 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Try recalling the page by going through the internet archive website, you may be able to find it. TomStar81 (Talk) 08:25, 13 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Building

They're still in the Sir Leonard Tilley Building, not the Sir Edward Drake building (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ECHELON). However, they are slowly moving (expanding) back into the SED.

Maybe a part of the Canadian part of ECHELON could be incorporated here? They're a little off with some of the numbers, though. As for the source of the 1600+ staff, see http://www.hrma-agrh.gc.ca/pas-srp/report-rapport_e.asp?cat=f

The press kit (http://www.cse-cst.gc.ca/documents/media-room/media-kit.pdf) gives 2004 numbers at 1200 people, budget of almost $200CAD, almost double the $110CAD stated in the ECHELON page.

The biannual Ottawa Artsfest is also the only way I know of that a person can gain access to the building and at least walk through the halls. This is quite a treat, since in 2004, they had a Cray MP in one of the foyers, and in 2006, a Cray X-MP/24 (like the Y-MP but with dark blue instead of red panels).

I don't really know what kind of information should go into the CSE page, but I've been there (2004, 2006) and I have a friend who works there.

Redirection from CSE

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

CSE should go to the disambiguation page. There are too many other CSE's and I don't think this one is notable enough to have CSE go directly here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Andareed (talk • contribs) 22:00, 18 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

References

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I've cited 4 more lines to increase the validity of some of the contents. Jon202ca (talk) 14:33, 10 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

prism and org. crime, and telephone surveillance hacks.

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

In recent years in southern BC the telephone systems operators have been repeatedly advised of cell phone hacking by org. crime. when the RCMP was asked to refer the matter to CSE, the officer refused and due to vast and layers of intense corruption in the RCMP due to drugs, infiltration etc. the RCMP failed even make the minimal effort to assist those who were making the complaints. in Obamas version of reality, org. crime can't use judges, crown attorney, police etc. cell phone hacking by security forces to defeat the law? opinions welcome184.70.114.90 (talk) 20:44, 11 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Portuguese link not going to Communications Security Establishment

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The portuguese link of this page is being directed to a soccer club and not to "Communications Security Establishment" which would be the correct portuguese version of the page. It is being redirected (wrongly) to "Clube Sociedade Esportiva". Can anyone correct this? I did try but couldn't - it always return to the soccer club.thank you.Talencar (talk) 07:22, 15 April 2014 (UTC)TalencarReply

As per previous topic, "The portuguese link of this page is being directed to a soccer club and not to "Communications Security Establishment" which would be the correct portuguese version of the page. It is being redirected (wrongly) to "Clube Sociedade Esportiva".". Can this be corrected? I also couldn't and it always return to the soccer club.Thank you. RACHNEL1000 (talk) 12:37, 25 April 2014 (UTC)RACHNEL1000Reply

Official Shield

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Buenos-ding-dong-diddly-dias:

I noticed that the official shield does not exactly match the English translation, that is, I think it would be better if the shield read "informationem" rather than "nuntium." I think "nuntium" is more like "announcement." You might like to pass that on to the agency, as presumptuous as it may seem.

Of course, the shield was probably designed by an expert in Latin...

Adios,

70.72.45.131 (talk) 17:30, 28 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Communications Security Establishment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:23, 11 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic